The HATE = uncontrollable sexual tension theory of slash rises again!
And yeah, I figured one of the reasons the dresses looked nice was because our dear Ms. Knightly needs four or five yards of fabric around her to fill her out. On the average person they might be excessive bulk. Still, the 2005 dresses are more likely to be flattering than the 1995 dresses, don't you think? (As well as not requiring ones' breasts to occupy about the same space as one's collarbones, which, ow, Elizabethen corsets. Ow.)
no subject
And yeah, I figured one of the reasons the dresses looked nice was because our dear Ms. Knightly needs four or five yards of fabric around her to fill her out. On the average person they might be excessive bulk. Still, the 2005 dresses are more likely to be flattering than the 1995 dresses, don't you think? (As well as not requiring ones' breasts to occupy about the same space as one's collarbones, which, ow, Elizabethen corsets. Ow.)